• Skip to Content
  • Skip to Channel Navigation
  • Skip to Information Links
  • Skip to Accessibility Information
HR Magazine LogoHR Magazine
  • Home
  • News
  • HR August 2010
  • Features
  • HR Studio
  • Solutions
  • HR TV
  • Forums & Blogs
  • White Papers
  • Analysis
  • Case Studies
  • Interviews
  • Opinion
  • Reviews
 
  • Home:
  • Features:
  • Poor human capital management can jeopardise mergers and acquisitions success
Poor human capital management can jeopardise mergers and acquisitions success

Poor human capital management can jeopardise mergers and acquisitions success

David Woods, 12 March 2010

1

1 comment on this article.

Merger and acquisition (M&A) activity is set to increase in 2010, but failure to address human capital issues could damage the chances of achieving maximum value.

 

A report by Hewitt Associates reveals corporate transaction activity is expected to increase in 2010, even though many acquiring companies around the world say they are falling short in meeting their deal objectives.


Hewitt's quarterly M&A pulse survey of 278 organisations around the world found 72% expect to maintain or increase their deal activity over the next two years. Research from Capital IQ showed that global deal activity in 2009, including M&As), joint ventures, divestitures and IPOs/spin offs, totalled US$2 trillion.

Despite the expected increase in deal flow, the Hewitt global M&A survey highlights one common factor - the failure to address the human capital issues that increase the chance of achieving maximum value.

Hewitt found a clear link between deal success and proactive management of the leadership and key talent issues. Overachievers and underachievers both say leadership and talent strategies are important to the success of a deal (69% versus 62%, respectively). However, less than a third (32%) of underachievers report their leadership and key talent strategy in transactions as being effective, compared with 70% of overachievers. Overachievers are also twice as likely to effectively identify and retain leaders (81% vs 42%) and assess critical talent (73% vs35%).

Of the 69 European headquartered organisations that participated, over half (54%) said their past transactions did not achieve their intended financial and strategic objectives. Globally, almost two-thirds (62%) of companies indicated that leadership and key talent retention are critical to the success of a deal, while over half (57%) of these organisations reported that they have lost vital employees at the same rate or at an even higher rate than non-vital employees.

A previous Hewitt analysis in 2008 showed that the loss of vital employees can have a devastating impact on corporate transactions. Based on a sample of 96 companies representing more than $568 billion in total deal value over a two-year period, Hewitt's analysis found that more than $54 billion - or 10% - of a deal's value depends on the rate at which vital employees leave an organisation during or immediately after corporate transactions.

Stephan Vamos, European leader of Hewitt's Corporate Transaction and Transformation practice, said: "As we examine the reasons why companies aren't achieving their M&A goals, it's not surprising that the inadequate management of leadership and talent issues is at the core. It is known that the loss of critical talent and leader capabilities can be enough to erase much of the value companies sought in the deal. A lack of agreement among the post-transaction organisation's leadership can be as devastating. Put simply, poor human capital management can be a true deal-breaker."

"Most companies have an infrastructure and the resources to retain, focus and develop their critical talent pool, yet many organisations fail to execute a rigorous and sustained approach to retaining leadership and key talent, permitting key people at all levels to walk out of the door or to be out of line with key deal objectives.

"As companies prepare for their next transactions, there is a real opportunity for a dramatic improvement in their chances of success. Having a formal strategy and game plan for leadership and key talent - and effectively executing it - is imperative for achieving better deal success and retaining a competitive edge during a tough economic cycle."

 

X

You must login to use Clip & Save

  • Print
  • Clip &
    Save
  • News
    by email
 

Share:

  • Bookmark on...
  • Del.icio.us
  • Stumble It!
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • DIGG
  • Google
  • Yahoo
 

Your Comment

 
 

To post comments please log in here

 

All Comments

Stuart Shaw - 13 March 2010

Totally agree that having a game plan in place to retain talent is vital. What's key here is M&A due diligence. An M&A for example that doesn't establish the compatability - or not - of the two company cultures - is always likely to lead to failure. Human Potential Accounting www.hpa-group.com offer this to companies looking to merge with a Culture Audit. Not to be confused here of course with a simple opinion survey!

 

Related Media

Hewitt Associates and Aon Consulting to merge

Latest News

140 new jobs across the country at Travelodge's newly-acquired Innkeeper's Lodges

Mercer acquires ORC Worldwide to strengthen its capabilities in global workforce management

NorthgateArinso acquires HR management division of Convergys

 
News By Email

Poll

Is truly authentic and effective leadership something CEOs are born with as opposed to something they can be taught?

 

Directory

 

Latest Issue

Latest Issue

August 2010

Read our exclusive August 2010 e-zine featuring an interview with the founders of Reid looking back on the last 50 years of the recruitment business
Subscribe
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Skip to Main Navigation
Haymarket

Haymarket © 1957 – 2010

  • About Us
  • Register
  • News By Email
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility
  • News
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • Management Today
 
  • Contact Us
  • News By Email
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
  • Newsfeeds
  • Sitemap
  • My HR
  • register
  • Log In