• Skip to Content
  • Skip to Channel Navigation
  • Skip to Information Links
  • Skip to Accessibility Information
HR Magazine LogoHR Magazine
  • Home
  • News
  • HR August 2010
  • Features
  • HR Studio
  • HR eBooks
  • Solutions
  • HR TV
  • Forums & Blogs
  • Employee Benefits
  • Learning & Development
  • Employment Law
  • Recruitment
  • HR People
  • Research
  • Technology & Metrics
 
  • Home:
  • Ministry of Justice launches new rules to ensure employers give successful tribunal applicants their payouts
Ministry of Justice launches new rules to ensure employers give successful tribunal applicants their payouts

Ministry of Justice launches new rules to ensure employers give successful tribunal applicants their payouts

David Woods, 30 March 2010

 

Be the first to comment on this article

The Justice Minister Bridget Prentice confirmed the creation of a new Employment Tribunal Fast Track scheme, which will simplify the process for successful tribunal applicants, allowing them extra help to receive payouts from their former employers.

 

From 6 April successful claimants can call on an extended service from the High Court Enforcement Officers if the other party fails to pay the award ordered by the tribunal. An Officer will complete the court processes for them and move on to enforcement as soon as possible. This will put increased pressure on employers

According to the MoJ, the move is necessary because of the high number of employers failing to pay.
 
Justice Minister Bridget Prentice said: "The Government is determined to ensure people are not denied access to justice by a small minority of unscrupulous individuals or companies who refuse to respect the award. The fast track will ensure all recipients can pursue their awards with ease.'

Applicants will be asked to pay the £50 court fee needed to issue a writ to seize assets which will cover the amounts they are owed and this will be added to the debt owed by their employer.

The £70.50 the High Court Enforcement Officer would normally charge the employee if the award could not be recovered will be waived.

Research published by the Ministry of Justice in May 2009 showed 39% of people granted awards by tribunals had not been paid and only 53% were paid in full.

Details of more than 570 individuals and companies who have failed to make payments in the past year have been added to a searchable database.

The Ministry of Justice began adding them to the register in April 2009 to encourage others to make sure they paid up.

The database, which can be searched by members of the public and credit reference firms, contains details of defaulters who have court judgments, orders, criminal fines and now tribunal awards registered against them.

The fast track has been created following discussions with Citizens Advice who have lobbied for a cost free process to help employees.

 Audrey Williams, head of discrimination at Eversheds, added:"Tribunals generally have no formal powers to enforce awards of compensation, which has meant that employers are sometimes dilatory in making payment. Indeed, research by the Ministry of Justice last year suggested this has become an increasingly widespread issue, with 39% of employers failing to pay and leaving unpaid claimants to seek recovery through the court system.

"Since last year, defaulting employers have started to be named and shamed on a searchable database. Today's announcement represents a further step aimed at ensuring tribunal awards are paid or paid more promptly by giving successful claimants a helping hand in the legal process for enforcing tribunal awards and greatly speeding up the process. Employers will need to respond more quickly to tribunal decisions if they are to avoid increasing the amount payable through charges and interest.

"There is another, less obvious factor, of which employers should be aware in cases involving allegations of discrimination but which might prompt early payment. It is now clear, following a case last year, that non-payment of an award can itself constitute an act of discrimination, compounding any acts which preceded and, if challenged, commanding additional compensation."

 

X

You must login to use Clip & Save

  • Print
  • Clip &
    Save
  • News
    by email
 

Share:

  • Bookmark on...
  • Del.icio.us
  • Stumble It!
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • DIGG
  • Google
  • Yahoo
 

Your Comment

 
 

To post comments please log in here

 

All Comments

There are currently no comments.

Related Media

Contracts of employment aren't worth the paper they are written on - or are they?

Scrapping default retirement age could be highly damaging to small firms, says Forum of Private Business

SMEs claim HR red tape ties up so much of their time they neglect core activities necessary for survival

There are both winners and losers if default retirement age is abolished

Employers need clear policies for dealing with close relationships between work colleagues

British Airways case highlights need for restrictions on email and internet usage at work to be spelled out

Latest News

Crime in small business soars

Be proactive in offering support to employees affected by tax payment fiasco

Forum of Private Business claims National Insurance holiday is not enough to stimulate economic recovery

 
News By Email

Poll

Do you think employers should pay interns some form of wage (other than expenses)?

 

Directory

 

Latest Issue

Latest Issue

September 2010

Is the pursuit of 2:1 degrees undermining diversity?

Interview with TNT's HR bosses

How does the business partnering model work for learning and development professionals?

Subscribe
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Skip to Main Navigation
Haymarket

Haymarket © 1957 – 2010

  • About Us
  • Register
  • News By Email
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility
  • News
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • Management Today
 
  • Contact Us
  • News By Email
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
  • Newsfeeds
  • Sitemap
  • My HR
  • register
  • Log In