Cost-cutting employers are setting themselves up for long-term problems
David Woods, 03 July 2009
1
1 comment on this article.Employers are so concerned with cutting costs they are setting themselves up for more problems in the long term, claims Watson Wyatt.
The consultancy carried out research on firms in the UK and Middle East and found 43% are planning to reduce UK headcount and 70% will cut budgeted pay increases.
Less than a third of companies are targeting their reward budget on key employees but focusing on high performers rather than those with business-critical skills.
But employers are engaging employees in other ways, such as increased communication around change (75%), better communication on business results (74%), higher visibility of senior managers (45%), more communication on pay and reward (41%) and greater focus on mentoring programmes (35%).
Carole Hathaway, European head of strategic reward consulting at Watson Wyatt, said: "Despite a majority of companies claiming to have a greater focus on their key talent, few are supporting this by actually targeting their reward spend on them. Top performers are not necessarily the same as those with business-critical skills.
"Few companies appear to have the reward and performance programmes that enable them to make this important distinction. But failure to reward adequately those with business critical skills - as well as high performers - can have implications on retaining these key workers when the economy recovers."
To post comments please log in here
All Comments
DENIS BARNARD - 03 July 2009
There is no indication of what size of employer were included in this study.
It's all very well being "academic" about the right thing to do from an ivory tower, but in a jam you will focus on high performers to get you through the crisis, failure to do which will mean that there will be no employees with business-critical skills to worry about anyway.
I suspect that from what has been said in the article that the organisations are pretty sizeable in order to be able to carry some of the overhead attached to the employee engagement.
I wonder what WW would have said about RBS in its former existence with all its Human Capital indicators set to "all employees engaged -all systems go"?
Even great reward packages and communications for all won't save a flawed business model, indifferent product or a management that has insufficient experience.
Your Comment